MRMedRigorResearch

Research integrity

Integrity commitments

The boundaries governing assessment and any later MedRigor Research engagement.

Operational draft requiring legal and professional review. These commitments should be supported by documented procedures as the pilot develops.

Authorship and disclosure

MedRigor will not provide ghost authorship or help conceal material contributions. Contributions must be acknowledged or disclosed in accordance with applicable journal, institutional, and professional requirements.

Evidence and methods

Reviews distinguish verified facts, methodological judgments, uncertainties, and preferences. Material references are checked directly when within scope, and analytical limitations are stated.

Prohibited work

MedRigor will not knowingly support fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, citation manipulation, undisclosed conflicts, deceptive image alteration, manipulated peer review, misrepresentation, or concealment of findings.

Artificial intelligence and tools

Tools may assist bounded, documented tasks but do not replace accountable expert review. Use must respect confidentiality, data-protection duties, journal policies, verification requirements, and any necessary disclosure.

Conflicts, competence, and escalation

Projects are screened for expertise, conflicts, risk, and fit. Work beyond available competence is narrowed, referred, or declined. Serious integrity concerns may require suspension and appropriate escalation consistent with contractual, legal, and professional duties.

Client responsibilities

Clients remain responsible for the authenticity of data and materials, author approvals, ethics and regulatory compliance, declarations, final analyses, final manuscript content, and all submission decisions.

← Return home