MedRigor Insights
Concise, evidence-aware resources on manuscript quality, study design, statistics, interpretation, submission, and revision. Educational guidance cannot replace review of a specific project.
Why unclear questions, design limitations, outcome problems, analytical weaknesses, incomplete reporting, unsupported conclusions, and poor reproducibility attract major reviewer concern.
Read the guide →A structured approach to causal language, effect magnitude, precision, multiplicity, subgroup findings, missing data, limitations, and generalizability.
Read the guide →From the research question and estimand to model assumptions, missing data, effect estimates, uncertainty, diagnostics, sensitivity analyses, and reproducibility.
Read the guide →Build a complete response matrix, quote each comment accurately, state the action taken, locate every change, and justify disagreements professionally.
Read the guide →Project-specific review
For a defined assessment of your own project, submit a concise inquiry and permitted de-identified files.